frontpage e-mail listabout us

The Market In Review:
Not Everyone Agreed The Good Times were Here to Stay

"Businesses must be willing to destroy the old while it is still successful if they wish to build the new that will become successful. If they don't destroy themselves, others will destroy them." - Lester C. Thurow, MIT, June 1999

Nearly a year ago, the Net was de rigeur with investors. People were talking about how the economic cycle of boom and bust brought to us by industrial corporations had vanished. The rules had changed in the Information Age.

The dot.com companies were telling the industrial giants - General Motors, Ford Motor Co., Toyota, and DaimlerChrysler - what they should do to join in or get left behind in the dustbin of history, like the buggy whip makers were.

The new economy seemed to have all the answers. The dot.coms were attracting capital investment at a rate that incurred both ire and envy from market traditionalists.

Dot.com millionaires were everywhere, with wealth that apparently rivaled the early automotive barons, such as John and Horace Dodge or even Henry Ford I.

Who would have thought things would turn out the way they did?

To be sure, there were people who decided to look beyond the economic landscape back in 1999 with the cold eye of pragmatism. They didn't like what they saw.

"It was the dot.com companies telling the industrial giants - General Motors, Ford Motor Co., Toyota, and DaimlerChrysler - what they should do to join or get left behind in the dustbin of history, like the buggy whip makers were."

I believe it appropriate to share the contents of the November 8, 1999, story written for the Monday Morning News a widely read industry trade publication.

The story began with a simple, thought-provoking question. Here is that story in its entirety:



Analysts Debate Possible Market Correction
By Joseph Cabadas

Could the U.S. stock market be on the verge of the crash of 1999?

That may seem like heresy, with the economy having ridden high for so long, not to mention low unemployment, record profits and auto executives from Ford Motor Co. CEO Jac Nasser to General Motors Corp. CEO (and Chairman) Jack Smith predicting car sales of up to 17 million units in 2000.

"On Nov. 8 or the ninth or 10th, we are predicting the bottom will fall out of Internet stocks," said Myron Stokes, president of eMOTION! REPORTS.com. "Meanwhile, we are predicting the (Dow Jones & Co. industrial average) will begin falling to 8,800 points in near term and to 7,500 by spring. This shouldn’t be viewed as a Doomsday scenario, because the Dow should be at 8,800 right now."

The recent rally in stock prices, since the Dow index dropped temporarily below 10,000 in mid-October (1999), has been the result of stock analysts, financial gurus and major firms telling investors not to panic, what Stokes calls market manipulation.

"The Dow can be manipulated by increasing or decreasing investor confidence," he added, pointing to the way investors react to statements by Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan as an example of market manipulation.

According to Stokes, an example of stock market manipulation is in South Korea, where three Hyundai executives were recently convicted in one of the worst cases in South Korea’s history of market manipulation.

There are four factors that will lead to the Dow’s drop, according to eMOTION! REPORTS.com consultants and key economic indicators, Stokes said.

"In late September, we had projected that the stage was set for the Dow to drop to 8,800 points in two weeks," Stokes said. "While it did not drop to 8,800 at that time, it did dip below 10,000 and sent shockwaves around the world."

Plus, there is an expectation that the Federal Reserve will raise interest rates by a half point in the very near future and, if Greenspan isn’t satisfied with the results, the Fed will probably hike interest rates by a total of 1.5 points by spring 2000.

"The next factor is that the Dow’s level cannot be sustained anywhere near 11,000 points to begin with," Stokes continued. "And last, this rally in the market began two years ago due to the artificial manipulation of the Japanese yen to undervalue it. This undervaluation is what caused Japanese investors and investors dealing in yen to come into this market, and boosted it well beyond 7,000; contrary to all previous market analyst predictions."

Stokes’ view, however, runs counter to the views of many in the auto industry.

G. Mustafa Mohatarem, General Motors chief economist, said: "In my first year at (Denison University in Ohio) I took a course on economist Milton Freeman who said, ‘Show me an economist that is forecasting what the stock market will do and I will show you a quack.’ It is only after the fact (of any downturn) that we will know if the stock valuations are justified or not. There is no way to know whether they are correct beforehand. Clearly, a lot of people feel they are appropriately valued."

Meanwhile, Steve Collins, president of the Washington D.C.-based Automotive Trade Policy Council, said: "Those who are predicting the market with certainty are making lots of money on Wall Street, but few predicted that this year (1999) would be as strong as it was."

Still, Collins added: "All bets are off when it comes to predicting the direction of the U.S. economy in the future."

The Automotive Trade Policy Council represents General Motors Corp., Ford Motor Co., and DaimlerChrysler AG.

In the past, the U.S. economy has been more cyclical, but it has remained strong and stable for six or seven years, and Collins said no one sees signs of that changing.

"The auto industry always parallels the U.S. general economic performance because cars are such a big ticket item and this relates to consumer confidence,’ Collins said. "When times are good, people purchase. When they have anxieties, they stop purchasing big ticket items."

Mohatarem also thought the connection between the devaluation of the yen in February 1997 an the rise of the U.S. stock market is ‘I think, a spurious relationship. The Dow is doing well because the U.S. economy is doing well.

Still, both Collins and Mohatarem agreed that the yen’s value had been artificially manipulated in 1997 by the Bank of Japan and the Japanese government - the yen-to-dollar ration went from 105 yen to one U.S. dollar to a 140:1 value.

"As an economist at GM (the yen’s drop in value) has been frustrating," Mohatarem said. "We wanted to negotiate a trade agreement with Japan in 1995 to open the Japanese market to car sales and parts exports. We did this deal when the yen was trading around 95 yen per dollar and, subsequent to that, the yen weakened substantially (by about 30 percent."

The weaker yen allowed the Japanese car manufacturers, for instance, to sell cars at a higher profit in the U.S., which is economics 101, Collins said.

Japan had a serious recession, so it was understandable that the value of the yen would drop, Mohatarem said, adding that it has returned back to the level it should be at vs. the dollar - roughly at a 104:1 exchange rate.

Yet, for Japan, "the second largest economy in the world, for it to manipulate its currency to promote exports is simply inappropriate," Mohatarem said.

Although Mohatarem said that there was a specious relationship between the U.S. stock market and the yen’s value, Stokes said that the GM economist’s and Collins’ statements clearly show there is a real relationship. So, as the yen’s value rises, it will prompt Japanese investors to pull out because their investment incentives in the U.S. will no longer exist.

Next, there have been several announcement of e-commerce initiatives within the past several weeks (in October and November 1999) that certainly have bolstered investors’ confidence in Internet stocks, such as Ford’s and GM’s announcements during the Specialty Equipment Manufacturers Association (SEMA) show in Las Vegas the week of Nov. 1, Stokes observed.

“Practically everyone acknowledges that there is nothing to sustain the momentum of Internet stock values.”

Wall Street is doing everything in its power to prevent a correction of the market from occurring, but at some point it will reach critical mass, Stokes said. "But, would you rather have the market go down in a predictable and controlled descent or in an uncontrolled descent?" he asked rhetorically.

Internet and technology companies are the future, but the fall in their stock value is a self-fulfilling prophecy, Stokes said.

"The word from Silicon Valley has been to expect a significant drop in Internet/tech stocks in early November (1999)," he said. "Practically everyone acknowledges that there is nothing to sustain the momentum of Internet stock values. The Internet stocks are the modern-day version of the emperor’s new clothes and soon everyone will realize that the emperor has nothing on."

An indicator of the weakness of Internet stocks’ value is that the Magellan Fund dumped all of its Internet stocks a couple months ago and replaced them with more traditional communications stocks, Stokes noted.

Regarding all of the glowing predictions of rosy car sales in 2000, if the market goes down by spring, it will have a chilling effect on all sales, Stokes said.

Mohatarem does, however, expect a slowdown in the American economy in 2000, but it will still be a good year.”

The Bubble Bursts

It was the claim of Wall Street analysts and others that we had broken away from the old cyclical economy; that the New Economy was going to take over the world as we left the Industrial Age behind to enter the Information Age.

It seems we hit a large pothole on the Information superhighway; one that left us - in auto industry terms - with a blown out tire and damaged power steering.

The overvaluation of the Internet stocks and their cash-burning business model, seemed odd to some. Of course there were economists who noted that a stock market crash was coming. But their voices of alarm were drowned out.

As 2000 progressed, it seemed that the Internet bubble wouldn’t burst and additional warnings from a few responsible analysts and journalists went largely ignored. But then, seemingly overnight, the ‘thinkable” and “predictable” thing happened. The economic bubble burst. One catalyst, of course, was the U.S. Federal government’s lawsuit launched against Microsoft, which, in the opinion of some, started the tech stocks tumble. Meanwhile, Greenspan’s attempts to slow the economy down from “overheating” started taking effect.

A roller coaster ride of Dow and NASDAQ movement was the order of the day. But, again, those who manipulated the market to artificially high levels kept advising people to stay the course. “Buy stocks when they’re cheap”, was the advice. After all, they didn’t have anywhere else to put their money. Certainly, no one would be foolish enough to re-invest in the old, established “Blue Chip” stocks; why, that would be non-progressive.

In the course of these market gyrations, I had the opportunity to interview Ford Chief Financial Officer Henry Wallace, following a third quarter 2000 financials news conference, about the chances of a post-presidential election recession. (Mind you, the bitter post-election fight between George W. Bush and Al Gore had not occurred at this point). Wallace responded that a recession wasn’t likely, but did say that 2001 would seem slower, by comparison to 2000.

As of this writing, the U.S. and Japan economies are in turmoil, perhaps in precursor to a crash. Moreover, Europe is not immune, owing to ever-present global economic linkages that virtually ensure that the health or illness of one correspondingly impacts the other. It is doubtful that anything less than a recession can be avoided at this point. And this despite expectations of yet another reduction in Federal interest rates by Alan Greenspan this week.

“Alan Greenspan is faced with two absolutes,” says e MOTION! REPORTS publisher Myron D. Stokes.

“One, that the market must be allowed to correct itself without further manipulation either by lower interest rates for additional - and artificial - stimulus, or unsupportable claims of market stability to calm investors; and two, the need to help stabilize the Japanese economy teetering at the brink of collapse. He is quite aware of the symbiotic relationship existing between the U.S and Japan dating back to the fall of 1946 when the war-shattered economy of the latter was rebuilt on the American model. Moreover, he is cognizant of the new role of the Japanese as a core partner with the U.S. in the maintaining of global economic stability. This inextricable linkage causes one to share the fortune or misfortune of the other.”

“Greenspan will act on Tuesday in the interest of stabilizing the Japanese economy, either through no further reductions in interest rates or even a half point increase to accelerate the rate of recovery.”

Stokes says that Greenspan will act on Tuesday in the interest of stabilizing the Japanese economy either through no further reductions in interest rates or even a half point increase to accelerate the rate of recovery. “The only reason that he will lower interest rates is if he comes under tremendous pressure - and I understand that he is - from the White House. He, of course, has the option to refuse.”

As we look back on the past 36 months , it should be clear that the market does indeed give us warning signs of difficulty or even impending disaster; but only if we have to courage to look for them.



Back to Front Page Now or return to Top or visit the Archives



74 W. Long Lake Rd. Suite 103 Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304

Site Search

Crisis on Asimov
Special Report
Crisis on Asimov

Focus on China
Special Report
Full Coverage

2002 Ford Explorer
Special Report
Full Coverage

Hyperdrive for a
New Millennium

Full Story

Engines: Power for
the Future

Feature Story

Condit Addresses
Economic Club of Detroit
Notable Happenings

Full Text

The Critic

Comprehensive vehicle
reviews and

Pdf Downloads
Vision 2050: Integrated
National Transport

Air Traffic Management:
Revolutionary Concepts

Site Map ... Go